Recent Streetsblog OHIO posts about Uncategorized

By Jason SegedyNovember 10, 2015Follow me on Twitter @thestile1972This is the fourth post of a 20-part series, detailing the social and economic characteristics of Akron’s neighborhoods.It is currently a time full of opportunities and challenges in Akron.  The mayor-elect, Daniel Horrigan, will take the helm in January as the city faces its most severe set of economic challenges since the collapse of the rubber and tire industry.On the other hand, this is a time of great energy, enthusiasm, and civic engagement in Akron - especially as a new generation of leaders across the public, private, and non-profit spectrum continues to work together in substantive ways both great and small.2015 represents a true demographic turning point for our city.  Our loss of not just population, but now households, too, is a direct result of our using up all of the viable, marketable housing that we had, and our tearing down more housing than we have been able to rebuild.Simply put – we are now at the place where we are physically unable to grow, because we are experiencing a net loss of housing – year after year, as it gets older and older.On average, we tear down 500 single-family homes every year in this city. On average, we build 10.New residents can move to Akron, of course, but they will simply be replacing someone who already lives here.We are playing “musical chairs” with our housing stock – one person replaces another, and every once in a while, another chair is taken away.We used to have 290,000 people.  We’re at 199,000 today.  I am convinced that we can grow again.  Those of us that already live here know that Akron is a great place to live.  Our challenge is to attract new residents to our city.We do this by making a great place even better - by building new housing, by rehabilitating existing buildings, by encouraging entrepreneurship and commercial redevelopment, and by using artistry in urban design to create irresistible places for people to live, work, and play.No matter how great of a place this city is to live (and it is) we can’t grow again if we don’t figure out how to build more housing than we tear down.  It’s simple arithmetic.  Right now, we have lots of houses that people don’t want, and not enough houses that people do want.Why does it matter if we keep losing population?Because the size of our population has incredibly important ramifications for our tax base; our employment base; the performance of our schools; the distribution of everyday amenities like grocery stores, shops, and restaurants; the delivery of public services; and less tangible, but equally important things like our sense of place and our sense of ourselves.  As our neighborhoods are abandoned, decline, and become hollowed out, access to social and economic opportunities diminishes along with the population:  the jobs disappear, the doctor’s offices disappear, the grocery stores disappear – relocated, often, to a distant and increasingly inaccessible locale.  To pretend as though the economic and social well being of city residents is not directly impacted by population decline is to turn a blind eye to reality itself.So, with all of this in mind, stick with me over the next three weeks, as we explore the city’s neighborhoods, one-by-one - and think about the challenges and opportunities that we have, working together, to revitalize them.EAST AKRONEast Akron is an inner-core neighborhood approximately two miles southeast of Downtown Akron.  Its precise boundaries with neighboring Middlebury (to the north) and Firestone Park (to the west) vary, depending on who you are talking to.People:Population:  12,445White:  41.8%Black:  49.7%Other Race:  8.5%Median Age:  32.0Under 20:  34.3%20-44:  31.7%45-64:  23.8%Over 65:  10.2%East Akron has a larger minority population than the City of Akron as a whole. The age of the population is younger than the citywide average.Households:Households:  4,958Average Size:  2.501-Person:  30.1%Family:  63.4%Non-Family, Multi-Person:  6.5%Median Income:  $23,613Income under $50k:  80.0%Income $50-100k:  16.8%Income over $100k:  3.2%East Akron’s household size is larger than that of the city as a whole. Household incomes are lower than the citywide average.Housing:Median Value Owner-Occupied:  $68,485Value <$100k:  89.7%Value $100-200k:  8.6%Value >$200k:  1.7%Units:  5,762Owner-Occupied:  47.9%Renter-Occupied:  52.1%Vacant (not for sale or rent):  5.6%Median Year Built:  1953Built pre-1960:  62.8%Built 1960-1979:  21.6%Built 1980-present:  15.6%1-unit Detached:  65.9%East Akron’s housing stock is less valuable than the citywide average.  The percentage of renters is slightly higher than in the rest of the city.  The vacancy rate is right at the citywide average.  The overall age of the housing exactly mirrors that of the city as a whole.  The number of single-family, detached homes is right at the citywide average.Demographic MapsNOTE:  At present, the maps below are fairly small and not able to be enlarged.  I’m looking into modifying the HTML code for my blog in order to enlarge them (with some trepidation), but, in the meantime, the most important thing to know when interpreting them is that there are eight colors - 4 shades of blue and 4 shades of yellow/red.  Each color represents 1/8 of the block groups in the city. The darkest blues are the bottom 1/8 of block groups (on whichever demographic characteristic you are looking at) and the darkest reds are the top 1/8 of block groups.Dark red areas are significantly higher than the city-wide average, while dark blue areas are significantly lower.  Light blues and yellows are close to the city-wide average.Percent White PopulationPercent Black PopulationPercent Other Race PopulationMedian AgePercent under 20 years oldPercent 20-44 years oldPercent 45-64 years oldPercent over 65 years oldAverage Household SizePercent 1-person HouseholdsPercent Family HouseholdsPercent Non-Family, Multi-Person HouseholdsMedian Household IncomePercent Households earning under $50,000Percent Households earning $50,000-$100,000Percent Households earning over $100,000Median Value of an Owner-Occupied HomePercent Homes worth less than $100,000Percent Homes worth $100,000 to $200,000Percent Homes worth over $200,000Percent Owner-Occupied HomesPercent Renter-Occupied HomesPercent Vacant (not for sale or rent) HomesMedian Year Homes Were BuiltPercent Homes built before 1960Percent Homes built 1960-1979Percent Homes built 1980-presentPercent 1-unit detached Homes

By Jason SegedyNovember 6, 2015Follow me on Twitter @thestile1972This is the second post of a 20-part series, detailing the social and economic characteristics of Akron’s neighborhoods.It is currently a time full of opportunities and challenges in Akron.  The mayor-elect, Daniel Horrigan, will take the helm in January as the city faces its most severe set of economic challenges since the collapse of the rubber and tire industry.On the other hand, this is a time of great energy, enthusiasm, and civic engagement in Akron - especially as a new generation of leaders across the public, private, and non-profit spectrum continues to work together in substantive ways both great and small.2015 represents a true demographic turning point for our city.  Our loss of not just population, but now households, too, is a direct result of our using up all of the viable, marketable housing that we had, and our tearing down more housing than we have been able to rebuild.Simply put – we are now at the place where we are physically unable to grow, because we are experiencing a net loss of housing – year after year, as it gets older and older.On average, we tear down 500 single-family homes every year in this city. On average, we build 10.New residents can move to Akron, of course, but they will simply be replacing someone who already lives here.We are playing “musical chairs” with our housing stock – one person replaces another, and every once in a while, another chair is taken away.We used to have 290,000 people.  We’re at 199,000 today.  I am convinced that we can grow again.  Those of us that already live here know that Akron is a great place to live.  Our challenge is to attract new residents to our city.We do this by making a great place even better - by building new housing, by rehabilitating existing buildings, by encouraging entrepreneurship and commercial redevelopment, and by using artistry in urban design to create irresistible places for people to live, work, and play.No matter how great of a place this city is to live (and it is) we can’t grow again if we don’t figure out how to build more housing than we tear down.  It’s simple arithmetic.  Right now, we have lots of houses that people don’t want, and not enough houses that people do want.Why does it matter if we keep losing population?Because the size of our population has incredibly important ramifications for our tax base; our employment base; the performance of our schools; the distribution of everyday amenities like grocery stores, shops, and restaurants; the delivery of public services; and less tangible, but equally important things like our sense of place and our sense of ourselves.  As our neighborhoods are abandoned, decline, and become hollowed out, access to social and economic opportunities diminishes along with the population:  the jobs disappear, the doctor’s offices disappear, the grocery stores disappear – relocated, often, to a distant and increasingly inaccessible locale.  To pretend as though the economic and social well being of city residents is not directly impacted by population decline is to turn a blind eye to reality itself.So, with all of this in mind, stick with me over the next three weeks, as we explore the city’s neighborhoods, one-by-one - and think about the challenges and opportunities that we have, working together, to revitalize them.CHAPEL HILLChapel Hill is an outer-ring neighborhood in Akron’s northeastern corner, which developed in a suburban style around the same time that the mall that bears its name was constructed (in 1967).People:Population:  4,202White:  69.2%Black:  22.5%Other Race:  8.4%Median Age:  42.5Under 20:  20.0%20-44:  32.6%45-64:  29.6%Over 65:  17.7%Chapel Hill has a slightly smaller minority population than the City of Akron as a whole. The age of the population is older than the citywide average.Households:Households:  2,175Average Size:  1.931-Person:  49.1%Family:  45.4%Non-Family, Multi-Person:  5.5%Median Income:  $26,161Income under $50k:  72.6%Income $50-100k:  22.9%Income over $100k:  4.5%Chapel Hill’s household size is much smaller than that of the city as a whole. Household incomes are lower than the citywide average.Housing:Median Value Owner-Occupied:  $101,277 (estimated weighted average)Value <$100k:  59.5%Value $100-200k:  38.8%Value >$200k:  1.7%Units:  2,395Owner-Occupied:  38.6%Renter-Occupied:  61.4%Vacant (not for sale or rent):  2.5%Median Year Built:  1967Built pre-1960:  27.0%Built 1960-1979:  57.5%Built 1980-present:  15.5%1-unit Detached:  46.9%Chapel Hill’s housing stock is more valuable than the citywide average.  The percentage of renters is higher than in the rest of the city.  The vacancy rate is low.  The overall age of the housing is newer than that of the city as a whole, with comparably little housing built before 1960 and after 1990.  The number of single-family, detached homes is lower than the citywide average.Demographic MapsNOTE:  At present, the maps below are fairly small and not able to be enlarged.  I’m looking into modifying the HTML code for my blog in order to enlarge them (with some trepidation), but, in the meantime, the most important thing to know when interpreting them is that there are eight colors - 4 shades of blue and 4 shades of yellow/red.  Each color represents 1/8 of the block groups in the city. The darkest blues are the bottom 1/8 of block groups (on whichever demographic characteristic you are looking at) and the darkest reds are the top 1/8 of block groups.Dark red areas are significantly higher than the city-wide average, while dark blue areas are significantly lower.  Light blues and yellows are close to the city-wide average.Percent White PopulationPercent Black PopulationPercent Other Race PopulationMedian AgePercent under 20 years oldPercent 20-44 years oldPercent 45-64 years oldPercent over 65 years oldAverage Household SizePercent 1-person HouseholdsPercent Family HouseholdsPercent Non-Family, Multi-Person HouseholdsMedian Household IncomePercent Households earning under $50,000Percent Households earning $50,000-$100,000Percent Households earning over $100,000Median Value of an Owner-Occupied HomePercent Homes worth less than $100,000Percent Homes worth $100,000 to $200,000Percent Homes worth over $200,000Percent Owner-Occupied HomesPercent Renter-Occupied HomesPercent Vacant (not for sale or rent) HomesMedian Year Homes Were BuiltPercent Homes built before 1960Percent Homes built 1960-1979Percent Homes built 1980-presentPercent 1-unit detached Homes

These are tough times for malls and shopping centers in America. Mostly, they are struggling with relevancy as millennials express a preference for places that blend seamlessly into their daily comings and goings.The “ReImagining Severance&rdquo...

The last time Cleveland updated its Comprehensive Plan, LeBron hadn’t made The Decision, the subprime lending fiasco hadn’t struck down whole neighborhoods like Slavic Village, downtown’s population was well below 10,000 and 8% of th...

How quickly has Opportunity Corridor become a Cleveland meme? The $331 million, five-to-six lane road to be built between I-490 and University Circle has become synonymous with its lead sponsor, Ohio Department of Transportation, and its uniform code ...

On the date (October 21, 2015) that Marty McFly set the Delorean time machine to land in “Back to The Future, Part II” Cleveland considered taking its zoning code back to a place that will support more urban, walkable places. Since the 192...